Яндекс.Метрика (function (d, w, c) { (w[c] = w[c] || []).push(function() { try { w.yaCounter30204589 = new Ya.Metrika({ id:30204589, clickmap:true, trackLinks:true, accurateTrackBounce:true }); } catch(e) { } }); var n = d.getElementsByTagName("script")[0], s = d.createElement("script"), f = function () { n.parentNode.insertBefore(s, n); }; s.type = "text/javascript"; s.async = true; s.src = "https://mc.yandex.ru/metrika/watch.js"; if (w.opera == "[object Opera]") { d.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", f, false); } else { f(); } })(document, window, "yandex_metrika_callbacks");
Jun Yan, Lianyong Feng, Alina Steblyanskaya, George Kleiner & Maxim Rybachuk
International Journal of Public Administration. рublished online: 03 Sep 2019
Год издания: 2019

Global civilization is experiencing social and economic turmoil. Human are experiencing deterioration of environment and uncontrollable declines in GDP. Traditional economic theory has
been continuously advancing yet seems unable to predict these crises or provide adequate public
policies to address them. A biophysical version of economic theory uses mass and energy flows as
well as environmental constraints to describe the delivery of goods and services. Ongoing
development in biophysical economic theory may provide some new guidance. In this review
paper, Authors analyze the progression of historical economic arguments, explore their assumptions and their development and compare them to the currently developing biophysical economics framework which, instead of focusing on investment, debt, and growth, focuses on sustainable
energy and mass flows to deliver goods and services to civilization.